User talk:Davebailey - Revision history

Aebrown: Respond

2010-09-22T16:52:51Z

Respond

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 22 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== STS article change ==		== STS article change ==
	I noticed that you added a responsibility to the [[stake technology specialist]] article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult firesides on using technology safely in the home." While I have no problem with an STS doing this if he were asked to do so by his stake president, I can find no documentation that would lead me to believe that this is an actual responsibility of the STS. I'm pretty sure that every other point listed as a responsibility is actually documented somewhere. If it is not a documented responsibility, then I think it should be in a separate section that describes other ways an STS can be helpful, but not be listed as a "responsibility." What do you think? -- [[User:Aebrown\|Aebrown]] 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)		I noticed that you added a responsibility to the [[stake technology specialist]] article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult firesides on using technology safely in the home." While I have no problem with an STS doing this if he were asked to do so by his stake president, I can find no documentation that would lead me to believe that this is an actual responsibility of the STS. I'm pretty sure that every other point listed as a responsibility is actually documented somewhere. If it is not a documented responsibility, then I think it should be in a separate section that describes other ways an STS can be helpful, but not be listed as a "responsibility." What do you think? -- [[User:Aebrown\|Aebrown]] 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

	:Hmm, my link is a bit tenuous, however- "You support all users of Church technology in your stake, including the stake presidency, bishoprics, auxiliary leaders, family history consultants, seminary and institute instructors, and others who use such technology in Church meetinghouses." suggests a responsibility to those who use these technologies outside the meetinghouses as well as in it. I'm fine with moving it out of responsibilities into suggestions. [[User:Davebailey\|David Bailey]] 16:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		:Hmm, my link is a bit tenuous, however- "You support all users of Church technology in your stake, including the stake presidency, bishoprics, auxiliary leaders, family history consultants, seminary and institute instructors, and others who use such technology in Church meetinghouses." suggests a responsibility to those who use these technologies outside the meetinghouses as well as in it. I'm fine with moving it out of responsibilities into suggestions. [[User:Davebailey\|David Bailey]] 16:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

			:: Hmm, the link to home usage is indeed tenuous, since the policy specifically mentions only Church meetinghouses. So I moved it into an "Additional suggestions" section, since I do agree that it is a valuable point to make. Thanks for the quick response. -- [[User:Aebrown\|Aebrown]] 16:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Davebailey: /* STS article change */

2010-09-22T16:19:51Z

STS article change

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 22 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== STS article change ==		== STS article change ==
	I noticed that you added a responsibility to the [[stake technology specialist]] article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult firesides on using technology safely in the home." While I have no problem with an STS doing this if he were asked to do so by his stake president, I can find no documentation that would lead me to believe that this is an actual responsibility of the STS. I'm pretty sure that every other point listed as a responsibility is actually documented somewhere. If it is not a documented responsibility, then I think it should be in a separate section that describes other ways an STS can be helpful, but not be listed as a "responsibility." What do you think? -- [[User:Aebrown\|Aebrown]] 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)		I noticed that you added a responsibility to the [[stake technology specialist]] article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult firesides on using technology safely in the home." While I have no problem with an STS doing this if he were asked to do so by his stake president, I can find no documentation that would lead me to believe that this is an actual responsibility of the STS. I'm pretty sure that every other point listed as a responsibility is actually documented somewhere. If it is not a documented responsibility, then I think it should be in a separate section that describes other ways an STS can be helpful, but not be listed as a "responsibility." What do you think? -- [[User:Aebrown\|Aebrown]] 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
			:Hmm, my link is a bit tenuous, however- "You support all users of Church technology in your stake, including the stake presidency, bishoprics, auxiliary leaders, family history consultants, seminary and institute instructors, and others who use such technology in Church meetinghouses." suggests a responsibility to those who use these technologies outside the meetinghouses as well as in it. I'm fine with moving it out of responsibilities into suggestions. [[User:Davebailey\|David Bailey]] 16:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Aebrown: Created page with '== STS article change == I noticed that you added a responsibility to the stake technology specialist article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult f…'

2010-09-21T19:47:20Z

Created page with '== STS article change == I noticed that you added a responsibility to the stake technology specialist article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult f…'

New page

== STS article change ==
I noticed that you added a responsibility to the [[stake technology specialist]] article: "Coordinate, but not necessarily lead, training such as adult firesides on using technology safely in the home." While I have no problem with an STS doing this if he were asked to do so by his stake president, I can find no documentation that would lead me to believe that this is an actual responsibility of the STS. I'm pretty sure that every other point listed as a responsibility is actually documented somewhere. If it is not a documented responsibility, then I think it should be in a separate section that describes other ways an STS can be helpful, but not be listed as a "responsibility." What do you think? -- [[User:Aebrown|Aebrown]] 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)